Online Casino News and Information

Archive for October, 2007

iMEGA Speaks out on Proposed UIGEA Regulations

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2007

iMEGA Speaks out on Proposed UIGEA Regulations

iMEGA is confident that the important and fundamental rights for which they are fighting in federal court in New Jersey will be vindicated.

In our ongoing lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, iMEGA has pointed to the unconstitutional, chilling effect that the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006 has already imposed on all of our digital civil rights, by stifling innovation on the Internet and impeding our otherwise content-neutral financial system. The proposed regulations jointly promulgated today by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Department of the Treasury would, if anything, aggravate these already intolerable circumstances.

The regulations proposed under UIGEA continue a trend to regulate our Internet freedoms by passing the responsibility to define legal and illegal purposes behind a web-based financial transaction on to neutral third parties, who then become victims of the system. In this case the victims caught between the government’s criminal punishment and ill-defined regulations are the payment system providers – credit card companies, banks, third party payment clearing houses.

The regulations, while they are supposed to provide for a system which identifies legal transactions between persons who are allowed to enjoy Interactive gaming, instead virtually condemn the system to complete elimination because of the payment system providers’ risk of criminal penalties and injunction against further financial transactions if they guess wrong. There are no standards in the proposed UIGEA regulations which allow companies or individuals to safely navigate the inconsistent laws or ever-changing web business environment.

We believe that our government can–and must do better–if the Internet is to continue to be the engine for growth and prosperity for all of us. That being so, iMEGA is confident that the important and fundamental rights for which we are fighting in federal court in New Jersey will be vindicated.

Read more on iMEGA.

UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act) Regulations Released Today

Monday, October 1st, 2007

UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act) Regulations Released Today

The long awaited Regulations are released, leaving things just as unclear as they were before.  Will all gambling sites take the U.S. players back? They can legally do so.

The Department of the Treasury has today released the regulations required by the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). The regulations appear to be as weak and confused as the UIGEA.

The regulations require all banking systems to stop unlawful Internet gambling transactions, but state clearly that it is very difficult to figure out what is deemed unlawful as the UIGEA does not make anything illegal that was not already illegal under federal and/or state law.

The new regulations point out the complications of implementing a list of what is and isn’t illegal Internet gambling…

“Any government agency compiling and providing public access to such a list {of unlawful gambling sites} would need to ensure that the particular business was, in fact, engaged in activities deemed to be unlawful Internet gambling under the Act. This would require significant investigation and legal analysis. Such analysis could be complicated by the fact that the legality of a particular Internet gambling transaction might change depending on the location of the gambler at the time the transaction was initiated, and the location where the bet or wager was received. In addition, a business that engages in unlawful Internet gambling might also engage in lawful activities that are not prohibited by the Act.”

The fact that the regulations point out that certain transactions would be legal in some states, but not in others could be interpreted as the government believing that casino games such as poker, slots, bingo, and blackjack, are actually not illegal under federal law and only illegal in states where laws explicitly say they are illegal. The only betting activity deemed illegal under federal law would be on sports, made illegal by the 1969 Wire Act.

This begs the question, can operators such as Party Poker, and 888 Holdings, based legally out of the UK, re-enter the US market while only disallowing bets and wagers from citizens in states where online gambling is expressed as illegal?

Currently, Microgaming powered casinos such allow gamblers from all states in the U.S. where Internet gambling is not deemed specifically illegal. Could Playtech branded casinos re-enter the US market now too?

Some analysis also believe it would be difficult to determine what is illegal and not because of the exceptions in the UIGEA for the Horse-Racing industry and state run lotteries.

The beginning of the regulations also take some of the fear off the actual gamblers in the United States who were nervous about receiving or sending money to any offshore gambling site.

The regulations state that the only people who could be held accountable for breaking any of these regulations (thus breaking the laws created by the UIGEA), or implementing these regulations, would be participants, defined as anyone who is “an operator of a designated payment system, or a financial transaction provider that is a member of, has contracted for services with, or is otherwise participating in, a designated payment system. The proposed regulatory definition clarifies that an end-user customer of a financial transaction provider is not included in the definition of ‘participant’, unless the customer is also a financial transaction provider otherwise participating in the designated payment system on its own behalf.”

The costs of implementing a list by the US government to deem certain transactions as unlawful Internet gambling transactions for the banks to use as a guideline were deemed by the Treasury to be ’significant’.

“This is because establishing a list would require considerable fact-finding and legal analysis once the U.S. Government identifies a gambling website. The Government must engage in an extensive legal analysis to determine whether the gambling website is used, at least in part, to place, receive or otherwise knowingly transmit unlawful bets or wagers. This legal analysis would entail interpreting the various Federal and State gambling laws, which could be complicated by the fact that the legality of a particular Internet gambling transaction might change depending on the location of the gambler at the time the transaction was initiated and the location where the bet or wager was received,” the regulations state.

Just in record keeping alone, the Treasury estimates that it would take 368,254 hours of work to implement these regulations.

The UIGEA, which has been debated as the worst law in United States history, may have been proven to be so with the long awaited release of the regulations for the Act.

Due to the poorly, and unclear regulations wording: Every site on the internet should allow the U.S. citizens back on their sites, as stated by a Capital Hill official.

Click here to read the UIGEA Regulations.

Watch here as we keep you updated on the latest news.