House Committee Hears Tax Proposal on Online Gambling

19 May 2010

The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing today on the tax proposals related to Internet gambling. According to Ways & Means Committee Chairman Sander Levin (D-MI), this was not a hearing about the legality of online gambling but,

“We meet today to explore the tax implication and proposals to legalize internet gambling. We need to get a sense of the size and scope of this emerging market which is almost exclusively conducted today outside the United States.”

Current bills being looked at from Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.) and Jim McDermott ( D., Wash.), have similar revenue raising goals but the bulk of that revenue comes from income taxes from winnings of players. McDermott however does have an 8% tax on deposits made which would have to be paid by the operators of the gambling sites.

Both of these bills would legalize and regulate online poker but still ban other forms of gambling online such as sports betting. This is how rep. McDermott put it.

“The rule of taxation in this committee is don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax the guy behind the tree. Well we found the guy behind the tree and what he’s saying is, if you would legalize me I would come out from behind the tree and I’d be glad to pay my taxes.”

What supporters told the panel was that over the next ten years, $42 billion could be collected as revenue for the federal government. The banking and gaming industries support the legislation but in general the opposition consists of Conservative groups, professional sports leagues and state attorneys.

In opposition of the legislation, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.), testified,

“It is unfathomable that Congress would consider legalizing a currently illegal activity that imposes harm on the most vulnerable members of our society just to raise money for more big government spending.”

McDermott’s bill would send 1/4 of the revenue generated by online gambling to foster care programs, the arts and early childcare education programs. It also gives individual states to opt out of the legislation but those that do would not get any of the revenue generated by the 8% deposit tax paid by operators.

Here is more information

Related News

  • 14 May 2010

    Canadian Man Pleads Guilty in U.S. Online Gambling Charge

    Douglas Rennick, a Canadian man, has pleaded guilty to a count of processing offshore bets of U.S. citizens. Originally Rennick was looking at a charge of conspiracy and bank fraud. He had allegedly laundered $350 million dollars for overseas internet gambling companies. Rennick was indicted in August and on Tuesday entered a guilty plea to the one charge in New York Federal court. Part of the plea was forfeiting $17.1 million and a possible prison term of 6-12 months.

    Read full article
  • 29 May 2006

    Politics of US gambling makes for odd bedfellows

    Politics of US gambling makes for odd bedfellows By Edward Alden in Washington Published: May 26 2006 22:36 | Last updated: May 26 2006 22:36 Financial Times Of the 50 states in the US, in only two – Utah and Hawaii – is it impossible to find a place to gamble legally. Casinos dot America’s landscape, from the neon palaces of Las Vegas to some 400 more modest facilities on Indian reservations.

    Read full article
  • 27 June 2006

    New state online gambling law raises doubts

    Monday, June 26, 2006 Seattle Post-Intelligencer / New state online gambling law raises doubts Some legal experts say it’s too broad to hold up in court By BLYTHE LAWRENCE AND TRACY JOHNSON P-I REPORTERS Weeks after a new state law about online gambling took effect, some legal experts are questioning whether it would hold up in court. The new law echoes a federal law that already makes Internet gambling illegal and upped the crime to a felony.

    Read full article